Babylonian Art Essay Research Paper Comparison of free essay sample

Babylonian Art Essay, Research Paper Comparison of Babylonian Art vs. Egyptian Art Over the history of adult male, there have been many comfortable imperiums that ruled in different parts of the universe. Babylon and Egypt are two of these imperiums that ruled about 500 old ages apart, but had one thing in common, great artistic plants. Wall pictures such as the Babylonian work Investiture of Zimrilim, and the Egyptian Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis are illustrations of the great plants of their times. Both pieces are rich in significance and background, portion many similarities, but differences can be seen in their manner due to the clip periods. The wall paintings Investiture of Zimrilim and Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis hold backgrounds that let viewing audiences into a little position of their ancient times. The first, Investiture of Zimrilim comes from circa 1750 B.C.E. in the great Babylonian Empire of Mesopotamia. We will write a custom essay sample on Babylonian Art Essay Research Paper Comparison of or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page It was constructed on a clay plaster wall of the Palace of Zimrilim, who was a modern-day of the Babylonian Ruler, Hammurabi. The castle was located in the capital metropolis of Mari, approximately 250 stat mis north of Babylon. This picture was one of the many extravagant wall pictures Zimrilim had to picture his laterality. It was made to demo the authorization of Zimrilim from the Ishtar, the Babylonian goddess of war, birthrate, and love. The piece was finally destroyed by the Babylonians who turned on Zimrilim and ransacked his castle ; nevertheless parts of the picture survived. The 2nd piece, Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis, besides depicts the meeting between a swayer and a divinity. This piece, shows the swayer Queen Neferati whose grave is where the picture rests. It is located in the Valley of Queens, near Deir el-Bahri in Egypt, and was painted between 1279-1212 B.C.E. Within the walls of the grave are many word pictures of the Queen utilizing hieroglyphics to sketch the figures. These are placed to demo the hereafter of the Queen who was buried with the offerings depicted in the picture. Like the first piece Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis, has an luxuriant background, merely one of their many similarities. In comparing the two plants at manus, it is easy to happen similarities, even though they were done in really different manners. First, both plants were made really formal, so that they could be worthy of the swayers to whom they belonged. They are really serious word pictures of the interactions of worlds and Godhead figures. Both pieces are asymmetrical in nature, but the Babylonian work shows an interior focal point on a frame at the centre, which is symmetrical. The colourss of each work are really impo rtant its intent, which explains why both plants use such a broad scope of colourss and equilibrate the light and dark strategies so good. The figures in these pieces are really stable and strong, and portion largely realistic proportioning of the human organic structure. Even though many things about these plants can be compared on a analogue, they are still really alone pictures with many differences. For the pictures Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis and Investiture of Zimrilim, Many elements of composing are much different in manner and beginning. The most noticeable difference about these plants would be the size. While the picture from the castle of Zirilim measured merely five and a half pess tall, while the picture on the grave of Neferati covered an full wall of the expansive construction. However, Zirilim # 8217 ; s picture was larger in one manner, it was much deeper. While the grave wall uses obviously white as a background giving it a really level expression, the Investiture of Zimrilim uses extended shading and contrast of light and dark to give it a three dimensional feel. Another large difference about how the pictures expression now has to make with saving. The work in the castle of Zimrilim was partly destroyed and now is in pieces and is losing parts, while the grave picture remains to the full integral. Despite the devastation, the focal point of the pictur e is in the untasted centre where Ishtar is facing Zimrilim. The creative person brings attending to the importance of this by bordering it, and holding all the animals faced toward the centre. Besides, the brightest point of the picture is focused on the authorization, and there are many symbols of power environing it. The original viewing audiences of the picture would hold been drawn toward the arms and king of beasts with the figure of Ishtar. Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis, nevertheless uses a much different strategy to pull involvement to its topic, the existent offering jars of aromas. This offering takes topographic point at the centre of the picture, which the angle of the ceiling and the outlining hieroglyphics both lead toward. Despite the differences in focal point, deepness, and other composing facets, both pieces can # 8217 ; t be denied as great plants of art. The plants of art discussed semen from really luxuriant backgrounds. They portion and oppose many facets of artistic composing, from size to colour strategies. The manners of the Babylonians and Egyptians, which contributed to these plants, were both really alone and great during their clip period. Their manner, grace, and attending to detail is what makes empirical pictures such as Queen Neferati Making an Offer to Isis, and Investiture of Zimrilim still considered great art even today.

William Mullin Vs Raytheon and the Disparate Impact †Ethics Essay

William Mullin Vs Raytheon and the Disparate Impact – Ethics Essay Free Online Research Papers William Mullin Vs Raytheon and the Disparate Impact Ethics Essay In a disparate treatment claim, the worker seeks to prove the employer’s discriminatory motive. In a disparate impact claim there need not be proof of intentional discrimination, but rather proof that the employer utilizes employment practices that are facially neutral in their treatment of different groups but in fact fall more harshly on one group than another and cannot be justified by business necessity. I would like to discuss one particular case that actually changed the law itself in regards to one particular janra. In 1999, the New Hampshire Federal Court ruled in the case of William Mullin Vs Raytheon that Disparate Impact does not fall under the umbrella of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act, or ADEA. William Mullin, a elder employee of Raytheon claimed that after many years of employment, his salary was cut by 10% when he was demoted from a level 15 employee, to a level 12 employee. The company claimed that downsizing and restructuring was the cause for the demotion. Mullin claimed that the corporate restructuring of Raytheon had a disparate impact on older workers who by their very nature had higher-grade levels because they had worked there longer. The court felt that Raytheon was justified in it’s choice to downsize and restructure its company that cost Mr. Mullin his salary. The company was going through dire straits due to massive defense budget cut backs. They needed to dramatically decrease expenditures and payroll is usually the first place to look. A number of other older employees of Raytheon also had issues with these cuts but had no luck getting the courts to buy into their claim. Mr. Mullin and his elderly associates were forced to live with the results of Raytheons decision, and inevitably the ruling of the courts. Immediate effects to my personal work environment are diverse. My retail employer, at least in my limited exposure, has never ran into situations that required downsizing and restructuring. We value our older work force and respect not only their years of service but their knowledge and experience as well. Now, if the time comes and decisions must be made on cut backs and realignments, than this case proves that a retailer does have the legal right to cut the salaries of those employees that make a great deal of money, whether they are young executives, or members of the elderly elite group. As a manager in a retail store, this ruling supports retailers stance on capped salaries for team members. Every year, most of my employees are eligible for a raise up to 60 cents an hour depending upon their work performance throughout the year. There is a small group of team members that are considered by corporate to be maxed out, or grand fathered and are not eligible for any more than a 5 cent raise per hour, no matter what their work performance. It takes many years of service to reach this lofty hour wage, but 2 of my employees know do not qualify for a full raise each year, both of which have been retail team members for 22 plus years. The nature of this rule and the length of time needed to reach the maximum pay grade has a much more negative affect on my elderly employees than my high school team. Obviously, the ruling in this case supports this type of negative impacts towards seniors that these types of rules cause. Research Papers on William Mullin Vs Raytheon and the Disparate Impact - Ethics EssayMoral and Ethical Issues in Hiring New EmployeesTwilight of the UAWAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into AsiaThe Project Managment Office SystemResearch Process Part OneTrailblazing by Eric AndersonCapital PunishmentNever Been Kicked Out of a Place This NiceThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever Product

The Late Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The Late Paper - Essay Example In the scenario presented, Kim is the most responsible person for her own failure. It may seem unfair, considering she has done her part in completing her requirements for the course, but did give in to the temptation of delaying its submission due to her desire for pleasure with her friends. She became complacent in her duty to submit her paper before its due date because it was already done ahead of time. Arnold, Kim’s husband, further puts Kim in trouble by refusing to drive his wife to her professor’s office to make it faster and more convenient for her to submit the paper. He is so immersed in his own insecurity of Kim’s rise to success that he tries to sabotage it by being unsupportive. His pride as the man of the house keeps him from allowing his wife to develop as person, as she is most likely to overtake him in terms of stature. Cindy, Kim’s classmate was a carefree influence in Kim’s decision to delay the submission of her paper. Cindy was out for a good time with Kim and her friends that she did not consider the importance of Kim’s priority. Philip, Arnold’s co-worker is responsible for planting insecurities in Arnold’s psyche by feeding him malicious information regarding Kim’s desire to better herself as a person through her studies. In teasing Arnold that Kim will be able to find a college guy to replace him, Philip has undeniable triggered Arnold’s jealousy, which prompted him to be unsupportive of Kim. Professor Freud has not been remiss in laying out her ground rules form the beginning. However, in Kim’s case, being an â€Å"A† student, the good professor should have just exempted her from her tardiness of a mere 15 minutes in submission of the paper. She knows how hard Kim has worked, and should have considered her performance for the whole term instead of a minor fault as a deciding factor in giving Kim an â€Å"F† for the course. Mary, Professor Freud’s secretary, tactlessly gave Kim assurance that